|
Page 4 InCider Press July 2003 |
|
Board Minutes (Continued from page 2) not been published. New publicity brochures have been completed and are ready for distribution. Show Chairman: Using the analysis created by Bill Bunyan, the Board discussed the profitability of the two-shows format first attempted this year. While profitability was not as great, there was definitely feeling that we ought to continue two shows if it is possible. Next year will create a problem in that McCain cannot give us time for a Friday night rehearsal. A decision will have to be made once all the scheduling problems have been worked out. Old Business: It was moved by Bob Swenson and seconded by Harvey Kiser that we bring the subject of riser chairs from the table. Discussion followed and it was generally agreed that we still do not have property management capabilities sufficient to support |
|
purchase of this type of equipment at this time. We received $753 from the Sharp family for this project, and need to continue work on it. It was moved by Bob Swenson and seconded by Richard Van Nevel to table this item of business. Motion passed. New Business: It was moved by Ken Garwick and seconded by Bill Bunyan that we accept the membership applications for Brian Wells and Doug Beauchamp. It was moved by Richard Van Nevel and seconded by Ken Garwick that we purchase the sixth riser extension in order to complete our riser set to six sections of 4-step risers with railings. Motion passed. It was moved by Bob Swenson and seconded by Richard Van Nevel that we accept the membership applications of Curt and Luke Messmer subject to their completing application and voice analysis. Motion passed. Adjournment: The next meeting will be held July 14, 2003 at 7:30 PM, at the Westbank Townhomes Clubhouse. A red-faced Rodney Stanfield has volunteered to provide refreshments for that meeting, to atone for his absent |
|
Last week I stepped into a photocopy shop and made a few copies. As I stepped to the counter to pay for the copies, the clerk was pleasant and helpful. I completed my transaction, said "Thank you!" and turned towards the door. She responded with "No Problem!" and smiled. As I left, I thought "No Problem!?!". Did she think that I might have thought it would be a problem to make and pay for some photocopying? A problem for me? A problem for her? If it was such a problem, why try to be in business anyway? "No Problem" has become a popular response that is supposed to mean, "it was not difficult for me to help you with whatever you just thanked me for". It suggests that it didn't take much effort or sacrifice to provide the assistance that was just given. I heard a similar comment from one of the barbershoppers after one of our summer Church Sing-out performances. One of the congregational members complimented several of us following the perform |
|
ance with "Thank-you" and "That was great!" Our colleague responded with the typical, "No Problem!" That's right, it was not a problem. In fact, it was fun, it was good fellowship, it was meaningful worship, it was a sense of community, and yes, it was great. Does a "No Problem" response from us mean that it doesn't take time or effort on our part to do the Sing-Out? Or is it just a habit or a trite, knee-jerk response to acknowledge a "Thank you" from someone? A simple "You're welcome" would have been sufficient. On the other hand, someone's "thank you" is a great opening for something a bit more... we can respond with "You're welcome, we enjoy doing this." Or "We love doing these performances as well as our shows." Use a simple response to show people that we enjoy performing and that we are greatful for their appreciation. "No Problem" tends to end the conversation, but a more open response might lead to an opportunity to tell interested people about our hobby, our programs, our charities and our efforts at promoting singing. When someone says, "Thanks", don't just react, engage with gratitude. |
|
When "No Problem!" is a Problem |